Advocacy: Reforms We Want
Knowing your rights is necessary, but it’s not enough. The system that enforces those rights in Manitoba has structural weaknesses, and as long as those weaknesses persist, employers will continue to bet, correctly, most of the time, that breaking the code is cheaper than following it.
Why This Matters
Section titled “Why This Matters”Each of these reforms exists because the current system pushes the cost of enforcement onto individual workers, the most exhausted, scared, and least-resourced people in the equation. Shifting that cost back toward the parties with the power to change practices (employers) and the institutions designed for enforcement (the Employment Standards Branch, the HR profession) is what would make the rights real.
If you’re a Manitoban who agrees with any of this, write your MLA. Tell them which reform matters most to you and why. A directory of MLAs can be found here:
https://www.gov.mb.ca/legislature/members/mla_list_alphabetical.html
This site advocates for the following reforms in Manitoba.
Stiffer Fines for Employers Who Blatantly Breach Labour Law
Section titled “Stiffer Fines for Employers Who Blatantly Breach Labour Law”The current penalty regime treats wage theft, unpaid overtime, and ignored stat holiday pay as recoverable amounts rather than as the violations they are. An employer who is caught doing this typically pays back what they should have paid in the first place, and that’s it.
That math is broken. If the only consequence of breaking the rule is paying what you should have paid anyway, the rational employer keeps breaking it. The vast majority of employees never file a claim, so the expected cost of a violation is a small fraction of the savings.
Other Canadian jurisdictions have moved on this. Manitoba has a $500 per employee fine with a maximum total fine of $10,000. Ontario, for example, doubled its maximum fine for “bad actor” employers to $100,000 under recent labour legislation. Manitoba should follow.
Quicker Turnaround on Employment Standards Claims
Section titled “Quicker Turnaround on Employment Standards Claims”The current claim process can take most of a year, and often longer when an appeal is filed. For a former employee who needs the money to pay rent, that delay is itself a punishment for filing.
The slow pace also helps employers in two specific ways:
- It encourages settlement at lowball numbers, because the alternative is another six months of waiting.
- It signals to other workers that filing is a long, exhausting process , which discourages them from filing at all.
Investing in staffing and intake capacity at the Employment Standards Branch would directly improve outcomes and shift incentives.
Mandatory Third-Party Training for New Employees, Sponsored by the Employer
Section titled “Mandatory Third-Party Training for New Employees, Sponsored by the Employer”Most workers don’t know what their Employment Standards rights actually are until something goes wrong. By then, they’ve often agreed in writing to terms they didn’t realize they couldn’t legally agree to.
A mandatory, third-party rights training, paid for by the employer but delivered by an independent organization, would change the baseline. Every employee starting a new job in Manitoba would learn:
- The hours-of-work and overtime rules
- Their vacation and stat holiday entitlements
- The leaves they are entitled to
- What termination notice looks like
- How and when to file a claim
The “third-party” piece is the point. Internal HR onboarding, however well-intentioned, has an inherent conflict of interest. An independent delivery removes that.
Legal Accountability for HR Professionals
Section titled “Legal Accountability for HR Professionals”In its current form, a company’s Human Resources department has no legal obligation to enforce the Employment Standards Code. HR professionals routinely sit in meetings where they understand a practice violates the code and stay silent, or worse, administer disciplinary action against employees who push back.
We advocate for either:
- Direct legal accountability placed on HR professionals to comply with the code, similar to the obligations placed on accountants, engineers, or other licensed professionals; and/or
- A formal whistleblowing channel and protection for HR professionals whose employers direct them to act in violation of the code, so that doing the right thing doesn’t cost them their career.
This is the reform that, more than any other, would change the texture of workplaces overnight.